[ˈmɪrɔslaʋ ˈʃɛɟɪviː]
Wien, AT
mastodon: @eumiro@mas.to
twitter: @eumiro
github: eumiro
RSS
tl;dr: If you are interested in optimizing your regular bicycle trips
(commute, shopping, …), start tracking them on your phone and save them as GPX
files. Then come back. I’m working on a Python project called pygohome
that
does cool stuff with it.
There are excellent online navigational apps for motorized vehicles drivers and public transport users that take the real-time situation into account. However, if you ask for the best route on bicycle or on foot, you usually get wrong results. Why?
Because cycling and walking depend on very personal factors. In most cars, most drivers are able (and have) to drive at the speed of the flow. That’s why online route planners are so good. On bicycle everything is individual:
There are also other factors that make each trip individual:
For bicycle rides between a few places in the city, I was interested in finding my best routes. Usually I like taking different routes in order to see how the city changes, but sometimes I just need the fastest route to get somewhere as quickly as possible.
Of course I could just measure the time needed for each route, but since there are so many factors, each time it would take more or less time. A city grid may also offer too many possible routes (aka Manhattan distance, snake distance or taxicab geometry) and the best route may be a combination of known segments.
What probability of success do I expect? If taking a longer road through a park takes between 5 and 6 minutes (depends on weather/road condition only) and a shorter road through the city takes between 4 and 8 minutes (because of the lights and traffic, and again weather and road condition), then I may get there faster through the city, but if I want to make sure (or very probable) I arrive in time, I’ll take the longer park option.
Using Manhattan distance, there may be the best route that I never took as a whole, but my tracks covered all its segments (roads between intersections) often enough to get a good recommendation. In this case, a special attention has to be paid to the intersections with lights and/or turn restrictions, since they don’t combine well. If there’s no wait to turn right, but turning left from the opposite direction takes minutes because of the red light, this intersection can’t be considered a simple node in the city grid.
So I’m tracking all my bicycle rides. From A to B, from B to A, from A to C stopping in D, and from D to F. With over one hundred tracks in a few months, I load them all and see a dense heatmap around and between my most popular places, as well as a few tracks of one-time trips elsewhere.
I have added waypoints to all these “points of interest”, and, since the current version does not support it correctly, added unnamed waypoints to all intersections where my tracks crossed, split or joined.
Then I wrote some Python code that dissects all tracks into segments, added special treatment of intersections where I spent more than a few seconds (because of lights) and calculates a directed graph, that gives me the answer to the question:
And it works. You will also be able to try it out. But first you will need a bunch of your GPX tracks to play with. So just install some GPS tracking app (OsmAnd works great) and take your daily trips. Ride normally. You’re doing it for the fun of statistics, not for Tour de France.
You’ll make cool stuff with pygohome on your computer later. No uploads of your private information, just some tweaking of Python code.
Stay tuned.